Skip to content
>GLB_
Go back

Should You Use AWS Lambda or AWS Glue to Update Records in HubSpot?

When integrating HubSpot with a data platform on AWS, a common architectural decision appears quickly: Should updates to HubSpot be executed from AWS Lambda or AWS Glue?
The correct choice depends on workload characteristics, latency requirements, and system design principles.

This article explains the decision from an architectural and data engineering perspective.

The Nature of the HubSpot API

HubSpot is a transactional HTTP API system. Updates are performed via REST endpoints such as:

HubSpot APIs are subject to rate limits and are optimized for application-layer interactions, not heavy ETL engines.

When to Use Lambda

Use AWS Lambda when:

Typical architecture:

System Event → EventBridge / SQS → Lambda → HubSpot API

This architecture is resilient, scalable, and cost-efficient.

When to Use Glue

Use AWS Glue when:

In this scenario, Glue should not call HubSpot directly. Instead:

Glue → Cleaned dataset in S3 → SQS/EventBridge → Lambda → HubSpot

Glue performs data engineering.
Lambda performs API integration.

This separation follows good data architecture practices: ETL layer ≠ Application layer.

Why this works well


This separation aligns with modern data platform architecture and event-driven integration patterns.

Conclusion

From an architectural standpoint, HubSpot updates belong to the application/integration layer, not the ETL layer. Therefore, in most scenarios, AWS Lambda is the correct tool for updating HubSpot records, while AWS Glue should be used only for upstream data preparation.

This distinction becomes critical as systems scale and is a common design pattern in modern data platforms.


Share this post:

Previous Post
Lambda vs n8n: A Simple Explanation for Data Workflows
Next Post
Understanding client_ingestion_warning in PostHog: Are You Losing Data?